|
|
HELP US SAVE OUR REPUBLIC
|
|
All messages that have been removed from the “Local Messages” page(s) are stored here. The Obama Administration’s Goals
Posted by Jim Sykes on March 29, 2009
During the campaign of 2008, we were told many stories about candidate Obama’s relationships with questionable individuals. None of these relationships were fully vetted by the mainstream media and we never really received the details. Candidate Obama never released his income tax returns, his medical records, his educational records and his birth certificate. His campaign has called our request for his birth certificate “garbage” but the simple fact remains that all he would have to do is release a copy of his “actual” birth certificate an all of the questions would go away. Instead, he has spent more than $800.000.00 on attorney’s fees to resist this simple action to settle this Constitutional question. WHY?? Does he have something to hide? My answer would be an absolute YES but his birth certificate is not the most important question that we have not been made aware of in his past. Mr. Obama’s relationship with a known communist, his relationship with ACORN, his tendency to follow the procedures set out in “Rules for Radicals” written by Saul Alinsky and his relationship with the Chicago politicians. If you delve into these questions, his place of birth will become less of a problem than how he intends to change our nation and the methods that he is using to accomplish his goal. Diane Alden has studied Saul Alinsky and her evaluation of him is very informative. In her 2003 article “Saul Alinsky and DNC Corruption”, she reveals the following: “Saul Alinsky died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer
who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions
of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. However, unlike Christian socialist and
activist for the poor Dorothy Day, Alinsky’s real claim to fame was as
strategist for anti-establishment ’60s radicals and revolutionaries. Indeed,
Alinsky wrote the rule book for ’60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton,
George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his
better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of
radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to
national prominence. Alinsky had
a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He
wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies:
“Reveille for Radicals” (1946) and “Rules for Radicals” (1971). “Rules for
Radicals” begins with an unusual tribute: “From all our legends, mythology,
and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins
– or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the
establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom
– Lucifer.” The devil
challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of
what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can,
including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends
justify the means. Alinsky
asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than
anything else: “My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to
get it and how to use it.” This is not to be done with assistance to the
poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: “[E]ven if all
the low-income parts of our population were organized … it would not be
powerful enough to get significant, basic, needed changes.” Alinsky
advises his followers that the poor have no power and that the real target is
the middle class: “Organization for action will now and in the decade ahead
center upon America’s white middle class. That is where the power is. … Our
rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the
middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois,
degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are
right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for
change, and the power and the people are in the middle class majority.” But that
didn’t stop Alinsky and his followers from using the middle class for their
own purposes. They counted on the guilt and shame of the white middle class
to get what they wanted. In order to take over institutions and get power,
the middle class had to be convinced that they were somehow lucky winners in
“life’s lottery.” Alinsky’s radicals found a perfect
vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly
for taking and maintaining power. That instrument was the Democratic
Party.” Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While
trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak
for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer and we all know
who taught him there. That
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama share an Alinskyite background tells us two
things. First, they are leftists, dedicated to overthrowing our
Constitutional system. Second, they will go to any length to conceal their
radicalism from the public. And this
from Michelle Obama’s speech in her DNC convention speech. "Barack
stood up that day," talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods,
"and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about
“The world as it is” and “The world as it should be..." And, "All
of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that
we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be." . . . “The world as it is” and “The world as
it should be?” is a direct quote from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals. Mr. Obama has not only taught
thousands of people in Chicago the “Rules for Radicals”, he has drilled these
rules into the mind of his wife, Michelle, and will no doubt, teach his
children the same. If we are to return America to the
principles of our founding fathers, we must learn the rules that are being
used against us by Barack Obama and the Democratic Party and then learn what
we must do to counter them. He is not following the Constitution, he is
following the “Rules for Radicals” and we must overcome his radical and socialistic
goals. If you would
like to read more about Saul Alinsky, e-mail me
and I will send you some links to other articles that I have collected and
read during the last year. |
